So, for writers out there who want me to read their books, you better spend
a good deal of time on the title and your cover. Because I'll tell you right
now, I do judge a book by its cover. I'm not ashamed of that; I don't want to
be reading a book in public with a cover that looks like a nine-year-old
designed it and have people looking at it like "What cheap nonsense is
this girl reading—she’s probably barely literate." No, sir—I am quite
literate and I want people to know it. So writers, don't skimp on your book
covers and/or spend practically no time considering your title thinking
"Oh people will read it anyway," because I certainly won't. And if I have to see another poem titled
"Untitled" I will burn it, and quite possibly the author as well.
Of course, that vain little habit of mine, like most vain little
habits, sometimes gets me into trouble. For example, Tara Bray Smith's Betwixt.
Yellow cover, mysterious butterfly lady-face, lovely word choice for a
title (I love a good random word title)--feels a little outdated but almost classic
in its minimalistic design. It catches my eye in the bookstore and I'm
immediately intrigued. I barely even read the back of it because I'm thinking
"Oooo, bright yellow! How pretty. This book is going to be awesome."
This book is NOT awesome. It is quite possibly the worst book I’ve ever read.
Okay, that may be an exaggeration, but I will tell you I couldn’t even finish
this book. And I’m really not someone who makes a decision like that lightly—I feel
that in order to have a comprehensive opinion of a book you have to see it
through to the end so that even if its merits are few, you are aware of all of
them. But this book is just so terrible I got fed up with it and tossed it.
And the saddest part about it is that it shouldn’t be as bad as it is. The
idea behind the book is actually very intriguing, verging on original even. The
story is a (very) little bit like Tithe. There’s this group of teenagers who
are basically changelings (kids who were replaced with fey/faerie creatures as
children). They’ve never known it and yet somehow they’ve always felt it—they’ve
always been a little off and a little magical. So basically they’re stalked by
this guy named Moth who is also a changeling, but he already knows it. And he’s
very mysterious and beats around the bush about what they really are for a while
before having them come to this ceremony, that seems like a concert to humans,
called the Ring of Fire. And there all is revealed. These kids are told they’re
meant to accept their fey spirits and once they do they’ll ascend to basically
the heaven/paradise of the fey.
As for the characters, they’re actually very interesting. They’re conflicted
and dynamic. They aren’t inherently evil or good characters and their
personalities are as unusual as real human personalities. One character is even
almost incestuous—how’s that for edgy. Plus, the fey are the creepy, twisted
magical creatures I’m such a fan of. And all of this is why I kept reading it
hoping it would get better—I really wanted to follow the story and the
characters.
Unfortunately, the writing almost completely blotted out all the books other
redeeming qualities. There is just something wrong with it. It’s so
frustrating. It’s not that there are a lot of grammatical errors or anything,
it’s just that it doesn’t make sense. And not in a good way like “Oh this book
is going to be confusing but it’s a masterpiece,” but in a “What? That doesn’t
make any sense!” *toss book across the
room and glare at it* way. The writing reads like no one else read it
before she published it. Like it just came out of her head and no one bothered
to tell her, “So, um, yeah I have no clue what you’re saying here.” I mean, I
was a writing tutor—I’m all for maintaining a writer’s voice while you’re
editing. But you can’t just leave everything the way it is if the writer is
incoherent. The plot is complicated enough without the writer’s inability to
describe things in a consistent way that makes sense.
And the dialogue is atrocious. Sometimes you can’t figure out who’s talking
to whom and sometimes it just sucks altogether. Smith didn’t spend enough time
working on emulating real, teenage conversation. The dialogue is forced,
confusing, and sometimes it’s trying way too hard to sound young and hip. In
defense of the dialogue (though I really don’t know why I’m defending something
I hated so much), it’s possible the writer is just from a completely different
dialectic area where people really talk like that. But, as a long time resident
of the Northeast, I have to say she’s not from around here.
So, you may be tempted (as I was) to read this book because of its
intriguing title and cover, but I'm telling you, don't drink the Kool-Aid! In
all seriousness, you can certainly try to read this book. And more power to you
if you like it more than I did. But in my opinion this is definitely one for
the box.
No comments:
Post a Comment